Was the Holy Spirit received in John 20: 22?


The question arises because of the apparent contradiction between what happened on the day of Pentecost when the disciples were baptised with the Holy Spirit (see Acts 1: 5; 2: 3, 4, 17, 33), and the Lord’s action five weeks earlier when He breathed into His disciples and said “Receive [the] Holy Spirit” (John 20: 22).

   Scripture is its own interpreter, and in John 7: 39, the writer comments that “But this he said concerning the Spirit, which they that believed on him were about to receive; for [the] Spirit was not yet, because Jesus had not yet been glorified”. When did the disciple’s position of being “about to receive” end? Clearly when Christ was glorified. Take another passage: “But when the Comforter is come, whom I will send to you from the Father, the Spirit of truth who goes forth from with the Father, he shall bear witness concerning me (John 15: 26). How is the Spirit sent by the Lord from with the Father? Clearly by the Lord going away to the Father (see John 16: 10 etc.). Again, what will the Holy Spirit “bear witness concerning me” (John 15: 26)? The answer is, “having come, he will bring demonstration to the world … of righteousness, because I go away to [my] Father” (John 16: 8, 10). The Spirit will bear witness to the Man now in the glory, vindicating the divine testimony to Jesus of Nazareth. Putting all this together, it is clear that the Holy Spirit was not sent (and therefore not received) until Jesus was glorified.

   So when was Jesus glorified? On the day of His resurrection, He tells Mary “Touch me not” (aptomaithat is, do not try to hold me down here)­ “for I have not yet ascended to my Father” (John 20: 17; comp. John 6: 62). Elsewhere we learn that after “being seen by them during forty days” (Acts 1: 3), He “was taken up” (v2)—that is, ten days before Pentecost. The conclusion is inescapable that the Holy Spirit was not received in John 20.

   What then does John 20: 22 (“Receive [the] Holy Spirit”) refer to? It has just been demonstrated that these words cannot mean that by breathing into the disciples, the Lord had imparted to them the Holy Spirit at that time. The fact is, I may be told to receive someone long before they arrive. Thus there is no reason why the Lord’s words cannot simply be anticipative of what was to follow at Pentecost (as is much in John’s Gospel—for example, eating the Lord’s flesh in John 6 was something the disciples could only come into afterwards). Why then, the striking action of breathing into the disciples, as if something were imparted there and thenfor the Lord clearly intended His action to convey something? The disciples would have been familiar with Gen 2: 7 where “Jehovah Elohim formed Man, dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and Man became a living soul” (see also Job 27: 3; 33: 4). It is not difficult to conclude that in His parallel action in John 20 the Lord was asserting deity—that “I and the Father are one” (John 10: 30). But He was doing so as a Man (comp. John 5: 26). If in Gen. 2: 7, Jehovah breathed into “The first man Adam” so that he “became a living soul” (1 Cor. 15: 45), in John 20: 22, “the last Adam” comes into view as “a quickening spirit” (1 Cor. 15: 45). Now in 1 Cor. 15, the context is the Lord raising the dead—which is clearly not the case in John 20, even though the Lord Himself is there as risen from the dead. What then are we to make of an action that symbolises the giving of life coupled with the instruction “Receive [the] Holy Spirit” (John 20: 22)? Indeed, why not simply say ‘receive life’?

   In Gen. 2: 7, the effect of the divine breath was that man “became a living soul”—that is, he received a life suited to this earth. In 1 Cor. 15: 45, our bodies will be energised and transformed in resurrection so that we are suited to the scene of glory which we will then occupy. In John 20 the point of the Lord’s outbreathing was in view of the apostle’s future service as sent of the Father (see vs. 21, 23). The words are “as the Father sent me forth, I also send you” (v21). How was the Lord sent? As a man anointed of the Holy Spirit: “And John bore witness, saying, I beheld the Spirit descending as a dove from heaven, and it abode upon him. And I  knew him not; but he who sent me to baptise with water, he said to me, Upon whom thou shalt see the Spirit descending and abiding on him, he it is who baptises with [the] Holy Spirit” (John 1: 32, 33). Hence the disciples were to be animated (made alive) at Pentecost in the Lord’s service by the Holy Spirit—not only as abiding “with you” (as in the Gospels, because the Spirit was in Christ, and Christ was with them) but “in you” (John 14: 17). Then they would have literally received, the One “whom the world cannot receive” (v17).

   Of course, one apostle (Thomas) was absent in John 20: 22. There he is really a type of the unbelieving Jews, but personally he had a part in the apostolic service that John 20: 22 has in view. That in itself is proof that the Lord’s words and action are symbolic of a future reality.

Previous